Festival HaMikdash Allnight – this coming Sat night in Tapuach B”H

August 1, 2009 by israelguy

ONE MUSIC FESTIVAL THAT WON’T BE

MUSIC TO THE EARS OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA

one event you do not want to miss-This Sat night –

Kfar Tapuach 10:00 PM

This coming Saturday night, join hundreds, if not thousands of hardline-supporters of the “settlement” movement who will camp out on a hilltop near “Kfar Tapuach” in the Shomron to take part in a unique, all-night music festival that features some of Israel’s top recording artists, such as Sinai Tor, Dov Shurin. Aaron Razel and Binny Landau.

But more important than being the first of its kind event in the region, perhaps, is the pointed message of defiance that organizers intend to transmit to American President Obama and an increasingly hostile international community through the festival.

Signs advertising the event shout: “Faith in G-d – not Obama! Yes to the hilltops and Temple Mount, No to Capitol Hill”, and appear replete with pictures of the Beth Hamikdash hovering over the White House. Organizers intend to close the event with prayers at dawn and a convoy to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, passing through several newly established hilltops along the way.

Tapuach’s Woodstock

Born out of Tapuach’s weekly Melaveh Malka concert series, this first, all-night “Mikdash Festival,” will be the tool that galvanizes the protest movement in the same way that Woodstock did for America’s hippie generation in the 1960’s, say organizers.

“During these days of intense pressure upon Israel to freeze all building and stifle all Jewish life in Judea, Samaria and parts of Jerusalem, it’s only fitting to respond with an event that brings tens of thousands of proud Jews together to gather strength and encouragement from one another and prepare for the struggle ahead,” says Moshe Kahn, one of the event’s organizers and an attendee of the original Woodstock event on Max Yazgur’s farm in 1969. “Music alone has the strength to accomplish that.”

The music starts this Saturday night at 10:00 PM, though organizers fully expect throngs to begin converging on the area with sleeping bags as early as Friday, and have made contingencies to assist those who wish to spend Shabbat at the site. To find out more about transportation and other matters related to the event, please call 0544876709.

It is unlikely that the 10 shekel cover charge will cover the costs of the event, so organizers are also seeking sponsors to help cover expenses – please email chanoisrael@gmail.com or call 0544876709

Before you boycott Israel!

July 28, 2009 by israelguy

A letter to CNN from Moscow: your coverage of the Gaza conflict

February 17, 2009 by israelguy

To CNN International Edition

I am an American citizen living and working in Moscow, Russia. My choice of western TV News here is limited, and I spend a fair amount of time watching the CNN International Edition. During the height of the conflict in Gaza I watched more than the usual, and became so disappointed with your unbalanced coverage, that I decided to write this letter.

If I were totally unfamiliar with the issue, by watching your channel I would have formed the opinion that Israel is a terrorist state that has no mercy for “Palestinian” women and children, and even specifically targets them. No other conclusion is possible when 90% of the coverage is devoted to pictures of destroyed houses, schools and mosques, and to funerals, without mentioning that:
· Hamas strategically places women and children in harm’s way (for your cameras)
· Hamas produces amateur weapons in residential buildings, schools and mosques
· Since Israel left Gaza, over 3000 rockets were fired at it from this Hamas-controlled territory
· Israel continues to supply Gaza with water and electricity (for free)- even during the hostilities

Israel’s point of view also makes it into your cameras, but it has no chance to register being so overwhelmed by the Arab side of the story. Is it possible to fairly report on a conflict while devoting 90% of the coverage to the sufferings of one side? Would you consider it fair and balanced today to report in great detail on the sufferings of the German people during the 1945 bombing of Berlin, with no mention of the Nazi atrocities and only a fleeting mention that the Nazis did something bad to start the war?

Your news programs are a significant factor in forming opinions around the world. Many of the people watching are open-minded and may have no prior knowledge of the issue, and it is no surprise that some of them participate in anti-Israel demonstrations, including ones with openly fascist rhetoric. These people don’t know that Israel left Gaza with infrastructure, including agriculture that could be cultivated– but Hamas is not interested in growing food, only in making bombs and rockets and shooting them at Israel. I know that because I visited Israel and talked to people – but I would never have learnt it if I relied only on your reporters for information.

I tried to understand why your coverage is so biased. Do pictures of dead people bring good ratings? Is it easier to paint Israel as the aggressor rather than Hamas? Certainly it is true in all moslem countries and most of Europe by now (thanks in part to you). My explanations seemed to be incomplete until I paid attention to the commercials between your newscasts:
· Traveling to Egypt
· Qatar Airlines
· Royal Jordanian Airlines
· Bank of Kuweit
· ORASCOM Companies

Is it a coincidence or does the fear to offend your Arab sponsors take priority over fairness and balance in reporting the truth? The answer seems obvious to me.

I hereby accuse you, CNN, of unfair reporting for the sake of your bottom line. I hold you, CNN, partially responsible for the demonstrations held around the world and for the financial support your coverage will bring to terrorists like HAMAS.

I am not a radical and I know my limitations. I cannot fight CNN, but I will make every effort to share this information with as many people as possible.

from here

Double Standard Watch: Israel, Gaza and International Law

February 4, 2009 by israelguy

Posted by Alan M. Dershowitz
The cease fire on the ground has not ended the war of words against Israel. Indeed, efforts to charge Israel with war crimes and other violations of international law are escalating. The time has come, therefore, for a common sense legal and moral analysis of the events in Gaza and southern Israel.
Let us begin with an argument that is frequently made against Israel. It is pointed out by supporters of Hamas that the official governing authority of Gaza is Hamas, because Hamas won the election. To the extent this is true, however, it is an argument in justification of Israel’s actions. If Hamas is the official government of Gaza and if Hamas ordered the firing of more of than 6,000 deadly rockets at Israeli civilians, then it follows that the government of Gaza has engaged in an armed attack against Israel under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. In other words, the government of Gaza has declared war against the government and people of Israel. This should not be surprising, since the Hamas Charter calls for the military destruction of Israel.
Under international law, and under the UN Charter, Israel has the right to respond to these thousands of armed attacks. Indeed every rocket fired into Israel is an armed attack and Israel is entitled to take whatever military actions is deemed reasonably necessary to stop these armed attacks from occurring. If Hamas were merely a small terrorist gang operating from Gaza but without the approval of the government, it would be more difficult to justify a military response that destroyed government buildings and targeted police. Israeli military actions resulted in civilians dying. Precisely how many is hotly disputed: a study conducted by the Italian Newspaper Corriere Del Sera disputed Hamas figures and put the total number of Palestinians killed, including Hamas terrorists, at less than 600. The sad reality is that people who voted for and actively support a terrorist government bear more responsibility for the actions of their government than they would for a gang operating against the wishes of the government. Surely the voters in Germany who elected Hitler bore more responsibility for Nazi atrocities than the people of Iraq did for the atrocities of the dictator Saddam Hussein, who was never fairly elected.
Israel clearly had to right to take whatever military action was necessary to stop the Hamas government from playing Russian roulette with the lives of its children. So far, no problem under international law. But here’s the rub. International law also requires that Israel’s actions must not be disproportional to its military aims and it also prohibits the willful targeting of Palestinian civilians.
To make things even more complicated, international law prohibits the use of human shields to protect combatants from lawful military actions taken by those against whom it has waged an armed attack. And there can be absolutely no doubt that it is the official policy of Hamas to use children, women, schools, mosques, hospitals and other civilian institutions and areas as shields to protect its combatants from legitimate Israeli military actions. In addition to the video evidence showing Hamas fighters deliberately placing their rockets adjacent to UN schools, mosques and to residential areas, there are the express statements of officially-elected Hamas leaders both before and during the fighting. Consider the following public statement delivered by a Hamas legislator, transmitted on Hamas television and widely circulated by video. The legislator’s name is Fathi Hammad and here is what he said:
[The enemies of Allah] do not know that the Palestinian people has developed its [methods] of death and death-seeking. For the Palestinian people, death has become an industry, at which women excel, and so do all the people living on this land. The elderly excel at this, and so do the mujahideen and the children. This is why they have formed human shields of the women, the children, the elderly, and the mujahideen, in order to challenge the Zionist bombing machine. It is as if they were saying to the Zionist enemy: ‘We desire death like you desire life.’”

There are videos available for all to watch in which Al-Aqsa TV news broadcasts a report showing a crowd of civilians gathered on the roof of a home that was a military target. Indeed those who arranged for these human shields to protect that military target do not shy away from actually using the term “human shield.” On another occasion, Hamas leader, appearing on television demands that “the people of Palestine should gather as one to protect the Jihad warriors’ house,” calling for these civilians to “die as warriors.”
So here is the legal dilemma faced by democracies such as Israel. They have every right under international law to take whatever military actions are necessary to stop the rockets randomly fired at their civilians. Their enemy uses human shields to prevent Israel from destroying the rockets without also killing Palestinian civilians. All the law requires under these circumstances is that Israel take reasonable precaution to minimize enemy civilian deaths in order to prevent the murder of its own civilians. Has Israel taken such precautions? Let retired British colonel Richard Kemp answer that question as he did in a recent BBC interview. He said that there has been “no time in the history of warfare when an army has made more efforts to reduce civilian casualties and the deaths of innocent people than the [Israel Defense forces did in Gaza.]” To accuse Israel of “war crimes” under these circumstances is to distort international law and expose the bias of the accuser.
from here

Ending the West’s Proxy War Against Israel

February 3, 2009 by israelguy

By GUNNAR HEINSOHN | From today’s Wall Street Journal Europe
As the world decries Israel’s attempt to defend itself from the rocket attacks coming from Gaza, consider this: When Hamas routed Fatah in Gaza in 2007, it cost nearly 350 lives and 1,000 wounded. Fatah’s surrender brought only a temporary stop to the type of violence and bloodshed that are commonly seen in lands where at least 30% of the male population is in the 15-to-29 age bracket.

In such “youth bulge” countries, young men tend to eliminate each other or get killed in aggressive wars until a balance is reached between their ambitions and the number of acceptable positions available in their society. In Arab nations such as Lebanon (150,000 dead in the civil war between 1975 and 1990) or Algeria (200,000 dead in the Islamists’ war against their own people between 1999 and 2006), the slaughter abated only when the fertility rates in these countries fell from seven children per woman to fewer than two. The warring stopped because no more warriors were being born.

In Gaza, however, there has been no demographic disarmament. The average woman still bears six babies. For every 1,000 men aged 40-44, there are 4,300 boys aged 0-4 years. In the U.S. the latter figure is 1,000, and in the U.K. it’s only 670.

And so the killing continues. In 2005, when Israel was still an occupying force, Gaza lost more young men to gang fights and crime than in its war against the “Zionist enemy.” Despite the media’s obsession with the Mideast conflict, it has cost many fewer lives than the youth bulges in West Africa, Lebanon or Algeria. In the six decades since Israel’s founding, “only” some 62,000 people (40,000 Arabs, 22,000 Jews) have been killed in all the Israeli-Arab wars and Palestinian terror attacks. During that same time, some 11 million Muslims have been killed in wars and terror attacks — mostly at the hands of other Muslims.

What accounts for the Mideast conflict’s relatively low body count? Hamas and their ilk certainly aim to kill as many Israelis as possible. To their indignation, the Israelis are quite good at protecting themselves. On the other hand, Israel, despite all the talk about its “disproportionate” use of force, is doing its utmost to spare civilian deaths. Even Hamas acknowledges that most of the Palestinians killed by Israeli air raids are from their own ranks. But about 10%-15% of Gaza’s casualties are women and minors — a tragedy impossible to prevent in a densely settled area in which nearly half the people are under 15 and the terrorists hide among them.

The reason for Gaza’s endless youth bulge is that a large majority of its population does not have to provide for its offspring. Most babies are fed, clothed, vaccinated and educated by UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East. Unlike the U.N. High Commission for Refugees, which deals with the rest of the world’s refugees and aims to settle them in their respective host countries, UNRWA perpetuates the Palestinian problem by classifying as refugees not only those who originally fled their homes, but all of their descendents as well.

UNRWA is benevolently funded by the U.S. (31%) and the European Union (nearly 50%) — only 7% of the funds come from Muslim sources. Thanks to the West’s largesse, nearly the entire population of Gaza lives in a kind of lowly but regularly paid dependence. One result of this unlimited welfare is an endless population boom. Between 1950 and 2008, Gaza’s population has grown from 240,000 to 1.5 million. The West basically created a new Near Eastern people in Gaza that at current trends will reach three million in 2040. Within that period, Gazans may alter the justifications and directions of their aggression but are unlikely to stop the aggression itself.

The Hamas-Fatah truce of June 2007 allowed the Islamists again to direct all their energy on attacking Israel. The West pays for food, schools, medicine and housing, while Muslim nations help out with the military hardware. Unrestrained by such necessities as having to earn a living, the young have plenty of time on their hands for digging tunnels, smuggling, assembling missiles and firing 4,500 of them at Israel since 2006. While this gruesome activity has slowed the Palestinian internecine slaughter, it forced some 250,000 Israelis into bomb shelters.

The current situation can only get worse. Israel is being pushed into a corner. Gazan teenagers have no future other than war. One rocket master killed is immediately replaced by three young men for whom a martyr’s death is no less honorable than victory. Some 230,000 Gazan males, aged 15 to 29, who are available for the battlefield now, will be succeeded by 360,000 boys under 15 (45% of all Gazan males) who could be taking up arms within the coming 15 years.

As long as we continue to subsidize Gaza’s extreme demographic armament, young Palestinians will likely continue killing their brothers or neighbors. And yet, despite claiming that it wants to bring peace to the region, the West continues to make the population explosion in Gaza worse every year. By generously supporting UNRWA’s budget, the West assists a rate of population increase that is 10 times higher than in their own countries. Much is being said about Iran waging a proxy war against Israel by supporting Hezbollah and Hamas. One may argue that by fueling Gaza’s untenable population explosion, the West unintentionally finances a war by proxy against the Jews of Israel.

If we seriously want to avoid another generation of war in Gaza, we must have the courage to tell the Gazans that they will have to start looking after their children themselves, without UNRWA’s help. This would force Palestinians to focus on building an economy instead of freeing them up to wage war. Of course, every baby lured into the world by our money up to now would still have our assistance.

If we make this urgently needed reform, then by at least 2025 many boys in Gaza — like in Algeria — would enter puberty as only sons. They would be able to look forward to a more secure future in a less violent society.

If the West prefers calm around Gaza even before 2025, it may consider offering immigration to those young Palestinians only born because of the West’s well-meant but cruelly misguided aid. In the decades to come, North America and Europe will have to take in tens of millions of immigrants anyway to slow the aging of their populations. If, say, 200,000 of them are taken from the 360,000 boys coming of age in Gaza in the next 15 years, that would be a negligible move for the big democracies but a quantum leap for peace in the Near East.

Many of Gaza’s young — like in much of the Muslim world — dream of leaving anyway. Who would not want to get out of that strip of land but the international NGOs and social workers whose careers depend on perpetuating Gaza’s misery?

Mr. Heinsohn heads the Raphael Lemkin Institute at the University of Bremen, Europe’s first institute devoted to comparative genocide research.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123171179743471961.html

Dear Citizen of Gaza

February 2, 2009 by israelguy

Letter from Yishai G (reserve soldier)

Hello,

While the world watches the ruins in Gaza, you return to your home which remains standing. However, I am sure that it is clear to you that someone was in your home while you were away.

I am that someone.

I spent long hours imagining how you would react when you walked into your home. How you would feel when you understood that IDF soldiers had slept on your mattresses and used your blankets to keep warm.

I knew that it would make you angry and sad and that you would feel this violation of the most intimate areas of your life by those defined as your enemies, with stinging humiliation. I am convinced that you hate me with unbridled hatred, and you do not have even the tiniest desire to hear what I have to say. At the same time, it is important for me to say the following in the hope that there is even the minutest chance that you will hear me.

I spent many days in your home. You and your family’s presence was felt in every corner. I saw your family portraits on the wall, and I thought of my family. I saw your wife’s perfume bottles on the bureau, and I thought of my wife. I saw your children’s toys and their English language schoolbooks. I saw your personal computer and how you set up the modem and wireless phone next to the screen, just as I do.

I need you to understand me, us, and hope that you will channel your anger and criticism to the right places.

I wanted you to know that despite the immense disorder you found in your house that was created during a search for explosives and tunnels (which were indeed found in other homes), we did our best to treat your possessions with respect. When I moved the computer table, I disconnected the cables and lay them down neatly on the floor, as I would do with my own computer. I even covered the computer from dust with a piece of cloth. I tried to put back the clothes that fell when we moved the closet although not the same as you would have done, but at least in such a way that nothing would get lost.

I know that the devastation, the bullet holes in your walls and the destruction of those homes near you place my descriptions in a ridiculous light. Still, I need you to understand me, us, and hope that you will channel your anger and criticism to the right places.

I decided to write you this letter specifically because I stayed in your home.

I can surmise that you are intelligent and educated and there are those in your household that are university students. Your children learn English, and you are connected to the Internet. You are not ignorant; you know what is going on around you.

Therefore, I am sure you know that Qassam rockets were launched from your neighborhood into Israeli towns and cities.

How could you see these weekly launches and not think that one day we would say “enough”?! Did you ever consider that it is perhaps wrong to launch rockets at innocent civilians trying to lead a normal life, much like you? How long did you think we would sit back without reacting?

I can hear you saying “it’s not me, it’s Hamas”. My intuition tells me you are not their most avid supporter. If you look closely at the sad reality in which your people live, and you do not try to deceive yourself or make excuses about “occupation”, you must certainly reach the conclusion that the Hamas is your real enemy.

The reality is so simple, even a seven year old can understand: Israel withdrew from the Gaza strip, removing military bases and its citizens from Gush Katif. Nonetheless, we continued to provide you with electricity, water, and goods (and this I know very well as during my reserve duty I guarded the border crossings more than once, and witnessed hundreds of trucks full of goods entering a blockade-free Gaza every day).

Despite all this, for reasons that cannot be understood and with a lack of any rational logic, Hamas launched missiles on Israeli towns. For three years we clenched our teeth and restrained ourselves. In the end, we could not take it anymore and entered the Gaza strip, into your neighborhood, in order to remove those who want to kill us. A reality that is painful but very easy to explain.

You must lead a civil uprising against Hamas.

As soon as you agree with me that Hamas is your enemy and because of them, your people are miserable, you will also understand that the change must come from within. I am acutely aware of the fact that what I say is easier to write than to do, but I do not see any other way. You, who are connected to the world and concerned about your children’s education, must lead, together with your friends, a civil uprising against Hamas.

I swear to you, that if the citizens of Gaza were busy paving roads, building schools, opening factories and cultural institutions instead of dwelling in self pity, arms smuggling and nurturing a hatred to your Israeli neighbors, your homes would not be in ruins right now. If your leaders were not corrupt and motivated by hatred, your home would not have been harmed. If someone would have stood up and shouted that there is no point in launching missiles on innocent civilians, I would not have to stand in your kitchen as a soldier.

You don’t have money, you tell me? You have more than you can imagine.

Even before Hamas took control of Gaza, during the time of Yasser Arafat, millions if not billions of dollars donated by the world community to the Palestinians was used for purchasing arms or taken directly to your leaders bank accounts. Gulf States, the emirates – your brothers, your flesh and blood, are some of the richest nations in the world. If there was even a small feeling of solidarity between Arab nations, if these nations had but the smallest interest in reconstructing the Palestinian people – your situation would be very different.

You must be familiar with Singapore. The land mass there is not much larger than the Gaza strip and it is considered to be the second most populated country in the world. Yet, Singapore is a successful, prospering, and well managed country. Why not the same for you?

My friend, I would like to call you by name, but I will not do so publicly. I want you to know that I am 100% at peace with what my country did, what my army did, and what I did. However, I feel your pain. I am sorry for the destruction you are finding in your neighborhood at this moment. On a personal level, I did what I could to minimize the damage to your home as much as possible.

Instead of sinking into self-pity, build a flourishing and prospering country.

In my opinion, we have a lot more in common than you might imagine. I am a civilian, not a soldier, and in my private life I have nothing to do with the military. However, I have an obligation to leave my home, put on a uniform, and protect my family every time we are attacked. I have no desire to be in your home wearing a uniform again and I would be more than happy to sit with you as a guest on your beautiful balcony, drinking sweet tea seasoned with the sage growing in your garden.

The only person who could make that dream a reality is you. Take responsibility for yourself, your family, your people, and start to take control of your destiny. How? I do not know. Maybe there is something to be learned from the Jewish people who rose up from the most destructive human tragedy of the 20th century, and instead of sinking into self-pity, built a flourishing and prospering country. It is possible, and it is in your hands.

I am ready to be there to provide a shoulder of support and help to you.

But only you can move the wheels of history.

Regards,
Yishai, (Reserve Soldier)

Account of Israeli attack doesn’t hold up to scrutiny

January 30, 2009 by israelguy

PATRICK MARTIN

From Thursday’s Globe and Mail

January 29, 2009 at 4:00 AM EST

JABALYA, GAZA STRIP — Most people remember the headlines: Massacre Of Innocents As UN School Is Shelled; Israeli Strike Kills Dozens At UN School.

They heralded the tragic news of Jan. 6, when mortar shells fired by advancing Israeli forces killed 43 civilians in the Jabalya refugee camp in the Gaza Strip. The victims, it was reported, had taken refuge inside the Ibn Rushd Preparatory School for Boys, a facility run by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.

The news shocked the world and was compared to the 1996 Israeli attack on a UN compound in Qana, Lebanon, in which more than 100 people seeking refuge were killed. It was certain to hasten the end of Israel’s attack on Gaza, and would undoubtedly lead the list of allegations of war crimes committed by Israel.

There was just one problem: The story, as etched in people’s minds, was not quite accurate.
U.S. envoy joins whirlwind of Mideast talks
From the archives

Israeli mortar fire off target by 30 metres, initial bomb probe finds
Israeli strike kills dozens at UN school
Physical evidence and interviews with several eyewitnesses, including a teacher who was in the schoolyard at the time of the shelling, make it clear: While a few people were injured from shrapnel landing inside the white-and-blue-walled UNRWA compound, no one in the compound was killed. The 43 people who died in the incident were all outside, on the street, where all three mortar shells landed.

Stories of one or more shells landing inside the schoolyard were inaccurate.

While the killing of 43 civilians on the street may itself be grounds for investigation, it falls short of the act of shooting into a schoolyard crowded with refuge-seekers.

The teacher who was in the compound at the time of the shelling says he heard three loud blasts, one after the other, then a lot of screaming. “I ran in the direction of the screaming [inside the compound],” he said. “I could see some of the people had been injured, cut. I picked up one girl who was bleeding by her eye, and ran out on the street to get help.”But when I got outside, it was crazy hell. There were bodies everywhere, people dead, injured, flesh everywhere.”

The teacher, who refused to give his name because he said UNRWA had told the staff not to talk to the news media, was adamant: “Inside [the compound] there were 12 injured, but there were no dead.”

“Three of my students were killed,” he said. “But they were all outside.”

Hazem Balousha, who runs an auto-body shop across the road from the UNRWA school, was down the street, just out of range of the shrapnel, when the three shells hit. He showed a reporter where they landed: one to the right of his shop, one to the left, and one right in front.

“There were only three,” he said. “They were all out here on the road.”

News of the tragedy travelled fast, with aid workers and medical staff quoted as saying the incident happened at the school, the UNRWA facility where people had sought refuge.

Soon it was presented that people in the school compound had been killed. Before long, there was worldwide outrage.

Sensing a public-relations nightmare, Israeli spokespeople quickly asserted that their forces had only returned fire from gunmen inside the school. (They even named two militants.) It was a statement from which they would later retreat, saying there were gunmen in the vicinity of the school.

No witnesses said they saw any gunmen. (If people had seen anyone firing a mortar from the middle of the street outside the school, they likely would not have continued to mill around.)

John Ging, UNRWA’s operations director in Gaza, acknowledged in an interview this week that all three Israeli mortar shells landed outside the school and that “no one was killed in the school.”

“I told the Israelis that none of the shells landed in the school,” he said.

Why would he do that?

“Because they had told everyone they had returned fire from gunmen in the school. That wasn’t true.”

Mr. Ging blames the Israelis for the confusion over where the victims were killed. “They even came out with a video that purported to show gunmen in the schoolyard. But we had seen it before,” he said, “in 2007.”

The Israelis are the ones, he said, who got everyone thinking the deaths occurred inside the school.

“Look at my statements,” he said. “I never said anyone was killed in the school. Our officials never made any such allegation.”

Speaking from Shifa Hospital in Gaza City as the bodies were being brought in that night, an emotional Mr. Ging did say: “Those in the school were all families seeking refuge. … There’s nowhere safe in Gaza.”

And in its daily bulletin, the World Health Organization reported: “On 6 January, 42 people were killed following an attack on a UNRWA school …”

The UN’s Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs got the location right, for a short while. Its daily bulletin cited “early reports” that “three artillery shells landed outside the UNRWA Jabalia Prep. C Girls School …” However, its more comprehensive weekly report, published three days later, stated that “Israeli shelling directly hit two UNRWA schools …” including the one at issue.

Such official wording helps explain the widespread news reports of the deaths in the school, but not why the UN agencies allowed the misconception to linger.

“I know no one was killed in the school,” Mr. Ging said. “But 41 innocent people were killed in the street outside the school. Many of those people had taken refuge in the school and wandered out onto the street.

From
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090129.wgazaschool29/BNStory/International/home

Conversation in London

January 30, 2009 by israelguy

Posted on Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:39:55 AM by SJackson

In the early sixties I enrolled at Sir John Cass College for captains and mates in London. It was considered an excellent school for officers and I was glad they accepted me for the course. After Israel’s War of Independence in 1948, I served as a seaman and later as a second officer with the Israeli merchant marine. The course at Sir John Cass College was to advance me to the rank of chief mate and eventually to captain. Most of the officers who participated in the course were young men from middle and upper class families, considered by the British to be ‘good officer material’.

The officers considered me an “odd bird”, as I was a Jew who came from Israel, and not too many Jews served in the British merchant marine. But, all in all, they were quite friendly and very sympathetic towards Israel, which was considered the ‘underdog’ at the time. Most of them later became captains serving with the British merchant marine. I made quite a few friends among the officers.

One of them, Randolph Smith, was my studying mate. After we passed our examination, I went back to Israel. In the beginning, we would correspond, and even meet when I happened to be in London, but as the years passed, we drifted apart.

In September of last year, I was visiting London and ran into Randolph Smith. He was now a retired captain and lived quite comfortably on his pension at his family estate. He still retained his boyish looks and wavy hair, which turned white with the years. He wore an expensive suit, fancy boots and had an aura of wealth about him that only the British know how to display without being overly ostentatious. He was very glad to see me and invited me for a drink to a very chic new hotel full of palm trees and overstuffed armchairs.

At nearby tables sat several Arabs in traditional garb drinking tea and reading Arabic newspapers. When he saw my looks, he laughed: “You don’t have to worry about them. They are rich Saudis with suitcases full of money, probably paying a thousand pounds a night for a room in this hotel. Hardly terrorist material.”

I wondered about that.

After ordering drinks and sandwiches, which came to fifty pounds he said: “Remember John Collins? He is coming to join us.”

John Collins was with us on the same course back then. I remembered him as a rather introverted, religious man.

Randolph told me a little of what he did since we saw each other last, and I was surprised to learn that after retiring from the merchant marine, he made his doctorate in political science. He had hoped to start a new career as a diplomat, but it didn’t work out.

After a while John Collins showed up. He had aged rather more than Randolph and walked with a slight stoop. We shook hands warmly and settled down to reminisce about the old days at school, and ended up telling sailor’s jokes.

“I say, do you still live in that God-forsaken Middle East? You seem to be treating those poor Palestinians quite shabbily,” John Collins said after we ordered a second round of drinks.

I was a little surprised by the shift of topic and his sudden change of tone. I remembered how John was staunchly pro-Israel in the days when we studied together and I asked him what happened to change his mind.

“All fair-minded people in this country think that your army behaves abominably against the Palestinian civilian population. Tanks and helicopters against kids with slings and rocks. You can’t deny that, can you?”

“Where do you get your information from?” I asked, while Randolph was trying to change the subject.

“Our news papers and television reports are full of what you are doing to the Palestinians, and far as I know, our newspapers and the media were always fair and neutral in reporting news.”

“Well, they are not fair and neutral anymore, as far as Jews and Israel are concerned. They are giving you a totally distorted picture of what is really happening. By now, you should be aware that it is they, the Arabs, who always start the wars against us, and the present war was no exception. When you start a war you have to suffer consequences. By the way, the same Palestinians you are so concerned about, towards the end of the thirties, waged an intifada against the British Mandate. Would you like to know how your soldiers treated your ‘poor Palestinians’?”

“The British army always acted in a civilized manner, no matter what you say,” John said in a proud voice.

“Did they, now? Let me relate to you how many Palestinians they hanged every day, and how they mistreated the civilian population. In comparison, the Israeli army is a very humane army indeed. So far, we didn’t hang a single Palestinian, no matter how much Jewish blood he had on his hands, and how many children he murdered.

“Let me quote to you some of what the British officials wrote about the Palestinians and what they did to punish them.

“In the late thirties the Arabs staged a revolt against the British authorities, killing officials and attacking British soldiers. To suppress the rebellion the British Chief Secretary Battershill made the following suggestions: ‘I doubt whether any Arab has really any ethical feeling against murder and I am sure Arabs look upon murder as a justifiable weapon. We shall never get them to change their fundamental belief on this point. Our only way to deal with them is to make them see that it does not pay.’

“And how do you think the British achieved that goal?

“To start with, they condemned over a hundred Palestinians to death and hanged them without mercy. On one occasion, the British hanged three Arabs the same day. Northern District Commissioner Alec Seath Kirkbridge was complaining that he had to view three bodies lying on slabs with purple faces. Young boys, some of them seven years old, were often sentenced to lashings. During the uprising the British demolished two thousand houses in Jaffa, Jennin and Nablus.

“Sometimes, whole villages were driven from their houses and placed in open fields. The British doctor Elliot Forester wrote in his diary that on May 1939, in the village of Halhoul, near Hebron, the Arabs were put in open pens, one for men and one for women. They were kept there for days without food and water. After two days, the British allowed the women to return home, but the men were retained.

“After that action, more than twenty people were lying dead on the fields.

“As for the hue and the cry about the security fence we are building to keep out the murderers of our children, let me tell you that you, the British, built such a fence in Palestine way before us.

“Soon after the rebellion began, the British sent a terrorism expert by the name of Charles Tegart. Charles Tegart had a security fence erected along the northern border to prevent the infiltration of terrorists. He built dozens of police fortresses around the country that are standing there to this day and are known as “Tegart fortresses”. He also imported Doberman dogs from South Africa and established an interrogation center in Jerusalem to train interrogators in torture. It is recorded that suspects underwent brutal questioning, involving humiliation, beating, and the Turkish practice of hitting prisoners on the soles of their feet and genitals.

“If you would like to know more of how the British quelled the Arab rebellion, against the Arabs, I gathered that information from a book called One Palestine, Complete by Tom Segev, who made a thorough historical investigation on the subject. Besides, all the information is available from British official documents.

“Of course, the British claimed that it was self defense, that they were simply defending themselves against the Arab terrorists, who were out to murder their soldiers and officials.

“So, before you accuse us of mistreating the poor Palestinians, you should examine what the British did under similar circumstances. But even that is not quite accurate. You were not subjected to brutal suicide bombers who blew up your civilian population, especially targeting young people and children.

“Yes, I can state in all fairness that in comparison to the British, the Israeli army is humane indeed.”

After I finished my long speech, I calmly drank my single malt whisky and ate the thinly sliced cucumber sandwich.

John looked at me in astonishment, while Randolph smiled.

“I say, you don’t really believe all the rubbish you told us about the way the British treated the Palestinians?”

“Randolph, I remember you told me that your uncle served as an officer in the Palestine police. Didn’t he speak about what happened there?”

Randolph laughed. “Sure he did, and the things that Solly just told us were just a small part of what we did to stop the rebellion. What my uncle thought of the Arabs could fill a dictionary of foul words. I think that what the Chief Secretary Battershill had to say about the Arabs was very accurate and if you Israelis would follow his advice, you wouldn’t be in the predicament that you are in now.

“As part of my course for my doctorate, I studied the Middle East very closely. The problem with you Jews is that you are trying to please a world that is basically anti-Semitic. Whether you are right or wrong doesn’t really matter; no matter what you will do, you will always be wrong.

“I followed the story of the battle in Jenin, where you practically sacrificed many good soldiers to appease world’s opinion, and what did you get? The world accusing you of a massacre that never took place. On the contrary, you sacrificed so many good men to prove that you are being fair. Ironically, the Americans almost at the same time, bombed the hell out of villages in Afghanistan, killing all the inhabitants, who were suspected Talliban supporters. They didn’t even bother to defend their actions. It took months for the prejudiced UN to admit that there was no massacre in Jenin and that the Arabs simply lied, as they usually do, to serve their cause.

“You know, and we all know, that the media focuses on the struggle between you and the Palestinians out of all proportion to the rest of the world’s news. Unless there are dozens of Israeli civilians, women and children flying through the air by some suicide bomber, you are always presented as the bad guys.

“Let us for one moment assume that Israel does not exist and that king Abdullah is the ruler of the whole region. Now, let us further assume that the Palestinians stage an intifada against the king. What the king would do we know from the past, when his daddy, King Hussein, killed thousands of Palestinians and chased Arafat and his lot out to Lebanon. The Palestinians mark that day as the Black September.

“And how the media reacted, we also know. They hardly mentioned it, and if they did, they were sympathetic to King Hussein. Now, imagine that the Jews ruled Jordan and massacred the Palestinians the way King Hussein did. What would have been the world’s reaction? These two scenarios show you how prejudiced the media and the world is against the Jews.

“So why don’t you just do what you have to do to survive there, because you will be damned if you do and you will be damned if you don’t; so just do what has to be done. Remember the words of the British Chief Secretary Battershill: ‘I doubt whether any Arab has really any ethical feeling against murder and I am sure Arabs look upon murder as a justifiable weapon. We shall never get them to change their fundamental belief on this point. Our only way to deal with them is to make them see that it does not pay.’ Follow his advice and you can’t go wrong. For a while, there will be an outcry against Israel, but soon they will forget about it, as they usually do, and the Arabs will only respect you, because the only thing they respect is force.”

For a while we sat in silence sipping our drinks. Then John Collins said: “You know, Randolph, I never heard you give such an elaborate speech about the Jews and the Arabs. I guess there are many things I simply had no idea about. You watch the telly and read your paper and they form your opinion for you. But, in a way, I am disappointed, because, as a religious man, I somehow expected that the people who gave us a Jesus and the Bible would act differently.”

“Well John, perhaps after two thousand years of turning the other cheek, the Jews got tired of it,” Randolph said, ordering another whisky.

We drank in silence and after a while said goodbye to each other. John Collins left first.

Randolph smiled as he shook my hand. “Anybody who bothers to learn the facts, unless he is an anti-Semite, would be on your side. It’s the ignorant ones that you have to persuade. You know, there is an old Roman saying that applies to you Jews: ‘Que licet Jovi, non licet bovi.’ ‘What is allowed to the Gods, is not allowed to the oxen.’ Algerian Islamic fanatics can kill a hundred and fifty thousand of their own Moslem brothers, and no one gives a damn. Millions of Africans die in wars against each other and who is to blame? And so on, and so on. But if a few Palestinian terrorists are killed in action against the Jews, the world media immediately goes into action denouncing Israel.”

On the way to the hotel, I thought about what Randolph said. He actually gave me some useful insights for my next conversations in Europe.

From http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1053826/posts

BBC Interview with Former British Army Colonel Richard Kemp

January 25, 2009 by israelguy

Real Facts

January 24, 2009 by israelguy

Palestinians lost not more than 600 people in the operaton “Cast Lead”. This fact was delivered to the correspondent of Italian newspaper “Correra dela Sera” by doctor Lorentso Cremonesi, working in the biggest medical center of the sector Gaza hospital “Shifa”. He says that the most part of the perished were Hamas militants at the age of 17-23, that were easily recognized by green kerchiefs. The doctor who certainly refused to tell his name, charged Hamas of deliberate exaggeration of losses.Many citizens of the sector share the doctor’s opinion. According to one of the citizens of Gaza Hamas sent to the war lightly armed teenagers of age under 18. These “warriors of Allah ” that could do nothing against Tzahal tanks and airplains terroriz